Washington DC's Gains Under Michelle Rhee: A Result of Cheating?

Updated
|
Washington DC's Gains Under Michelle Rhee: A Result of Cheating?
Michelle Rhee is in the hot seat once again, as concerns about cheating abound during her time as chancellor of Washington DC schools. Learn about the high incidences of erasures and why the accusations are flying.

Michelle Rhee is a controversial figure, to be sure. During her brief tenure as chancellor of Washington D.C. schools, Rhee managed to ruffle more than a few feathers. She also developed a loyal fan base that has followed her to her latest project, StudentsFirst, a non-profit committed to education reform. Since her exit from Washington schools, some questions remain about whether Rhee's approach to education reform really does put students first. Case in point: there are recent questions in an in-depth report by USA Today about a high number of changed answers on standardized tests in some Washington schools.

This video reports on Michelle Rhee's tenure as Chancellor of the D.C. public schools.

Details of the Report

An investigation by USA Today exercised D.C.'s Freedom of Information Act to obtain data that documented test scores for one of Washington's schools for the past three years. Crosby S. Noyes Education Campus was considered a "shining star" by Washington's public school officials after the school was able to raise standardized test scores by record-breaking numbers. In 2006, only 10 percent of Noyes students scored "proficient" or "advanced" in math. Just two years later, as many as 58 percent scored that high, and reading scores shot up as well.

Michelle Rhee was particularly interested in Noyes, and she used the school as an example of how she implemented changes that could transform struggling schools into academic powerhouses. The school was rewarded by Rhee in 2008 and 2010. Both of those years, teachers and the principal received hefty monetary bonuses from the state. However, the fact that Noyes proficiency rates skyrocketed much more quickly than other schools in Washington has raised some eyebrows – and some concerns – by educators and journalists reporting on the phenomenon.

This video reports on StudentsFirst.

Erasures Questioned

During their investigation, USA Today found that Noyes has an extraordinarily high number of erasures on their tests during those years. Investigators found a pattern of erasing wrong answers and switching them to correct ones. Noyes was one of 103 public schools in D.C. that had an irregularly high number of erasures on tests, which is more than half of all the schools in the district.

Erasures are detected by the same electronic scanners used to grade the tests. The testing company for Washington D.C. schools, McGraw-Hill, flagged six Noyes classrooms out of the eight taking the tests because of a high incidence of erasures during the 2007-2008 school year. A similar pattern was found in the next two school years, as McGraw-Hill flagged up to 80 percent of Noyes classrooms.

Responses to the Report

When the acting chancellor of D.C. Public Schools, Kaya Henderson, was questioned by USA Today about the high number of erasures, Henderson told the publication that "a high erasure rate alone is not evidence of impropriety." Henderson added that D.C. has "investigated all allegations of testing impropriety. In those situations in which impropriety has been found, we have enforced clear consequences for the staff members involved, without hesitation."

The Washington Post reports that in response to the allegations by USA Today, Henderson asked the D.C. Inspector General to investigate the reports of cheating on tests. Henderson also released a series of reports from a test security firm the District hired previously to investigate the erasure rate. Caveon Test Security investigated district schools in 2009 and found no evidence of test tampering at that time. However, questions were raised about whether the security company went far enough in questioning teachers about the test protocol. The investigators never questioned students, and parents were not notified of the investigation at the time. The D.C. Inspector General will interview the children who were tested, as well as their parents.

Rhee's Response

When Rhee was questioned about the possibility of cheating on standardized tests on her watch, Rhee called the allegations "insulting." Rhee's response is documented in the Washington Post, "It isn't surprising that the enemies of school reform once again are trying to argue that the earth is flat and that there is no way test scores could have improved for DCPS students unless someone cheated…This story is an insult to the dedicated teachers and schoolchildren who worked hard to improve their academic achievement levels."

Rhee reiterated her response to PBS host Tavis Smiley later that day. Her response to Smiley was also recorded in the Post, when Rhee said, "Oftentimes when the academic achievement rates of a district like D.C. go up, people assume that it can't be because the kids are actually attaining higher gains in student achievement, but that it's because of something like cheating, which in this case, is absolutely not the case."

Another report in the Washington Post stated that just two days after her response, she called Jay Matthews to apologize and called her comments "stupid." She agreed that cheating might have occurred in the district, and she voiced approval for the fact that her successor is following up with a new investigation of the possible problem. Rhee told Matthews, "You have got to have really strong test security protocols at the district level and at the state level. The vast majority of people will not cheat, but there will be exceptions here and there."

This video looks back at Michelle Rhee's career.

The results of the current investigations will be awaited by many anxious Washington residents, including the children who took the tests; the teachers who have their reputations on the line; and the parents who often select their children's schools by the test scores. Mostly, those in favor of standardized testing will be watching to see if this is another black mark against holding schools accountable for the test scores they produce.

Questions? Contact us on Facebook. @publicschoolreview

Additional Resources [+]
comments powered by Disqus

Recent Articles

Drug Testing Teachers: Testing Positive or Negative?
Drug Testing Teachers: Testing Positive or Negative?
This article examines the ongoing debate about drug testing for teachers in public schools. It discusses the rationale behind such policies, privacy concerns, cost implications, and the relatively low prevalence of drug use among educators. The piece also explores future considerations for drug testing policies in educational settings.
Head in the Clouds: Why Public Schools are Embracing Cloud Computing
Head in the Clouds: Why Public Schools are Embracing Cloud Computing
Explore how public schools are integrating cloud computing into their educational frameworks. Understand the advantages such as enhanced collaboration, cost savings, and accessibility, as well as the challenges schools face in adopting this technology.
Understanding Rubrics
September 27, 2024
Understanding Rubrics
This article explores the fundamental principles of rubrics in education, focusing on their role as assessment tools. It breaks down the key components of rubrics, including criteria, performance levels, and descriptors. The piece also delves into the two main types of rubrics - holistic and analytic - providing authoritative definitions and explaining their unique applications in educational settings.

Public School Policies

TEACHERS AND UNIONS
A comprehensive look at teachers, tenure, and unions. Learn how unions impact school performance. Explore the impact of education reform on teaching qualification standards, traditional unions and controversial tenure rules.
More Articles
Read more articles (10)
Education Reform (18) Public School Budgets (13) Vouchers (3) School Discipline Policies (16) School Controversies (47)