About Public Schools

Raising Kind Kids: How Public Schools Teach Empathy and Character Education

In an era defined by rapid technological change, social media pressures, and global uncertainty, academic achievement alone is no longer enough. Parents increasingly want schools to help their children become thoughtful, ethical, and compassionate individuals. The conversation has shifted from test scores to character, from competition to collaboration.

Understanding How Public Schools Teach Empathy and Character Education is essential for families evaluating their options. Across the United States in 2026, public schools are investing in structured programs that promote emotional intelligence, civic responsibility, and ethical decision making. Far from being add-ons, these initiatives are embedded into curriculum, discipline policies, and classroom culture.

This article explores how public schools are building kinder communities and preparing students not just for college and careers, but for life.

Why Empathy and Character Education Matter in 2026

Research continues to reinforce the importance of social and emotional learning, often abbreviated as SEL. According to the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning, high-quality SEL programs improve academic performance, increase positive behaviors, and reduce emotional distress.

In 2026, the emphasis has expanded. Schools are not only helping students manage emotions, but also teaching them to:

• Understand diverse perspectives

• Practice digital citizenship

• Engage in constructive dialogue

• Develop resilience and ethical reasoning

The U.S. Department of

The History of Public Schools in the United States

Public schools have played a central role in shaping American society for more than three centuries. From their origins in colonial New England to the technology-enabled classrooms of 2026, public education has reflected the nation’s evolving values, economic needs, and social challenges. Understanding the history of public schools helps parents, educators, and policymakers better evaluate where the system stands today and where it may be headed next.

This updated overview traces the major eras of U.S. public education, highlighting key reforms, controversies, and milestones that continue to influence schools nationwide.

Colonial Foundations and Early Education Efforts

The roots of public schooling in America date back to the 1600s, when education was largely a local and religious endeavor. In Puritan New England, literacy was considered essential for reading the Bible, leading communities to establish early schools supported by town funds.

One of the most significant early laws was the Massachusetts Bay Colony’s 1647 “Old Deluder Satan Act,” which required towns to hire teachers and establish schools. While limited in scope and access, these early efforts laid the groundwork for the idea that communities shared responsibility for educating children.

Outside New England, education developed more unevenly. In the Southern colonies, private tutors and plantation-based instruction were common, while access for girls, Native Americans, and enslaved people was minimal or nonexistent.

The Common School Movement of the 19th Century

The modern concept

Zero tolerance policies in public schools were originally designed to create safer learning environments by enforcing strict, predetermined consequences for specific behaviors. First widely adopted during the 1990s, these policies expanded rapidly in response to concerns about school violence and drug use. Today, zero tolerance remains a familiar term for parents and educators, but its application, impact, and public perception have evolved significantly.

As families plan for upcoming academic cycles, many are asking practical questions. How are discipline policies enforced today? Do zero tolerance rules affect school choice or enrollment decisions? What are the legal and emotional consequences for students? This updated article examines how zero tolerance policies function in modern public schools, the costs and challenges associated with them, and what parents should understand when advocating for their children.

What Are Zero Tolerance Policies?

Zero tolerance policies mandate specific disciplinary actions, often suspension or expulsion, for defined infractions regardless of intent or circumstances. Commonly cited violations include weapons possession, drug-related offenses, and serious acts of violence. In some districts, earlier versions of these policies also applied to less severe behaviors such as verbal threats or repeated classroom disruptions.

While federal law still requires strict disciplinary responses for certain offenses, particularly firearms on campus, many states and districts have revised their policies to allow greater administrative discretion. Today, zero tolerance is less likely to mean automatic punishment and more likely to exist as a framework within broader student discipline codes.

How Policies Have

Budgeting for School Lunch, After-School Care & Activities: Hidden Costs of Public Schooling

Public education in the United States is often described as free. Tuition is not charged, textbooks are usually provided, and attendance is guaranteed. Yet for many families, the reality looks very different. Budgeting for school lunch, after-school care & activities has become a significant household expense, revealing the hidden costs of public schooling that can add up quickly over the course of a school year.

In 2026, inflation pressures, staffing shortages, and expanded enrichment offerings have increased out-of-pocket costs for families across the country. Understanding these hidden costs of public schooling helps parents plan realistically and advocate for transparency and support within their school communities.

This article examines the most common areas where families encounter unexpected expenses and offers practical guidance on budgeting for school lunch, after-school care & activities in today’s public school environment.

Why the Hidden Costs of Public Schooling Matter

The phrase hidden costs of public schooling refers to expenses that are not immediately obvious when a child enrolls in a public school. These costs are rarely included in district enrollment materials, yet they are unavoidable for many working families.

According to education finance analysts, non-tuition expenses now represent one of the fastest-growing burdens on middle-income households with school-aged children. Budgeting for school lunch, after-school care & activities has become essential, not optional, for families seeking stability and academic continuity.

For families with multiple

Introduction

The discussion about whether public schools should adopt a year-round calendar continues to evolve in 2026 as families, educators, and policymakers weigh academic outcomes, cost implications, and household logistics. What once was a fringe alternative has moved into mainstream consideration, prompting questions about how calendar decisions affect student learning, family life, childcare, and long-term planning.

What Is Year-Round Schooling?
Year-round schooling typically involves redistributing the same overall number of instructional days across the entire year with shorter, more frequent breaks rather than one long summer vacation. Common models include the 45-15 schedule (45 days in session followed by 15 days off), 60-20, and 90-30 calendars. These schedules do not generally add instructional time, but they aim to reduce “summer learning loss,” maintain continuity, and provide intersession opportunities for remediation or enrichment.

Current Prevalence and Trends (2026)
About 10 percent of U.S. public schools now use a year-round or balanced calendar, a modest increase from earlier decades as districts seek solutions to post-pandemic learning challenges and scheduling inefficiencies.

In some places, year-round systems coexist with other scheduling reforms — such as later start times to support adolescent sleep health and block scheduling that allows longer class periods — illustrating a broader willingness to rethink traditional structures.

Academic Impact: Evidence and Debate
Proponents argue that balancing breaks across the year helps sustain learning. Research suggests long summer breaks can lead to significant “learning loss,” particularly in math and reading, which year-round calendars aim to mitigate.

Other