Students of Color Disproportionately Disciplined in Schools

Updated
|
Students of Color Disproportionately Disciplined in Schools
Research shows that students of color face a disproportionate number of disciplinary actions in U.S. public schools. Learn about these disparities, as well as the policies that fuel them. Also learn about suggested measures to address this problem.

According to a 2014 report by the U.S. Department of Education’s Civil Rights Office, widespread racial disparities exist in how schoolchildren are punished. The longitudinal study looked at data from the past 15 years and found that minority students face a disproportional number of disciplinary actions in schools across the country, from those in affluent suburban neighborhoods to those in the poorest urban areas.

Graph from HechingerEd

These disparities have been known for some time in middle and high schools. However, this report reveals that unfair discipline procedures begin as early as preschool. The data, which was collected from 97,000 public schools across the country, paints a troubling picture:

  • Black and Latino students are consistently punished more severely than white students for the same infractions.
  • Nearly 50 percent of preschool children suspended multiple times are black, yet black children represent less than one-fifth of the preschool population.
  • Black students are far more likely to be referred to law enforcement or arrested for a school-based offense than white students or other students of color.
  • Black girls are suspended much more than girls of any other race.
  • Students with disabilities, who represent only 12 percent of the public school population, account for almost 60 percent of students placed in seclusion.

Zero-Tolerance Policies

Many students suspended or placed in involuntary seclusion are put there because of the zero-tolerance policies that schools have put in place over the last two decades. Zero-tolerance policies began initially as a response to major infractions, such as possession of a weapon on school grounds or assault against a student or school employee. However, over the years, zero-tolerance policies have expanded to include less severe infractions, and as a result, the number of mandatory suspensions and expulsions has skyrocketed.

This PBS Newshour clip discusses racial disparities concerning discipline.

Critics of zero-tolerance policies point out that not only do these policies unduly target children of color, children who are suspended or expelled from school because of these policies face several additional negative consequences. Children suspended or expelled are much more likely to fall behind on schoolwork, be suspended again, be required to repeat a grade, or drop out of school altogether. Furthermore, students not in school may also use their abundance of “downtime” to engage in further negative behaviors and acts of delinquency, such as drug or alcohol use. Additional criticism of zero-tolerance policies is that they don’t teach corrective behaviors – students are punished swiftly and sent off school grounds to fend for themselves. But perhaps most troubling is the association between school discipline and the incidence of incarceration, a link that Attorney General Eric Holder calls a “school-to-prison pipeline.” Students who are consistently punished in school, especially students of color, have a much higher risk of becoming involved in the juvenile justice system and the criminal justice system as adults.

What’s the Solution?

The question now is, how do we fix this pervasive problem in the American educational system? The consensus seems to be taking a more positive approach to school discipline. Programs to improve the school climate, such as those that seek to reduce harassment, intimidation, and bullying, have been shown to reduce the number of discipline referrals significantly. Schools that have implemented these programs have seen as much as a 60 percent drop in the number of disciplinary actions taken over the course of an academic year. Other popular proactive approaches include:

  • Violence prevention – many behaviors that result in suspension or expulsion are related to violence. Delivering a prevention curriculum designed by school psychologists, counselors, or social workers can help students identify the warning signs of violence and equip them with the tools they need to manage their emotions and make more positive decisions.
  • Social skills training – some students lack the appropriate social skills to appropriately engage with their peers and adults. Programs like Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports seek to recognize and reinforce positive behaviors with proactive programs rather than focusing on reactive punishment measures.
  • Early intervention strategies – heading off negative behaviors early on is key to preventing those behaviors from escalating into major behavioral issues later.

This training video discusses school violence and how to identify the warning signs.

Secretary of Education Arne Duncan further suggests more counseling for kids, more training for teachers and classroom aides, and school-based programs that teach kids about conflict resolution strategies, communication skills, and anger management to reverse the trend of unfair discipline practices in our schools. To facilitate this change, the Department of Education is making $300 million in grant funding available to schools that seek a more positive and equitable approach to discipline.

While addressing the disparities in discipline procedures is not going to be a quick process, it is certainly one that needs to be undertaken if all schoolchildren are to receive equal access to the education they deserve. Implementing proactive strategies that help children learn appropriate behaviors to replace reactive punishment-based discipline seems to be a good place to start.

Questions? Contact us on Facebook. @publicschoolreview

Additional Resources [+]
comments powered by Disqus

Recent Articles

Drug Testing Teachers: Testing Positive or Negative?
Drug Testing Teachers: Testing Positive or Negative?
This article examines the ongoing debate about drug testing for teachers in public schools. It discusses the rationale behind such policies, privacy concerns, cost implications, and the relatively low prevalence of drug use among educators. The piece also explores future considerations for drug testing policies in educational settings.
Head in the Clouds: Why Public Schools are Embracing Cloud Computing
Head in the Clouds: Why Public Schools are Embracing Cloud Computing
Explore how public schools are integrating cloud computing into their educational frameworks. Understand the advantages such as enhanced collaboration, cost savings, and accessibility, as well as the challenges schools face in adopting this technology.
Understanding Rubrics
September 27, 2024
Understanding Rubrics
This article explores the fundamental principles of rubrics in education, focusing on their role as assessment tools. It breaks down the key components of rubrics, including criteria, performance levels, and descriptors. The piece also delves into the two main types of rubrics - holistic and analytic - providing authoritative definitions and explaining their unique applications in educational settings.

Public School Policies

SCHOOL DISCIPLINE POLICIES
Examine the various discipline methods being put to use in public schools. From detention to expulsion, spanking to handcuffing, school discipline can often be controversial. Does spanking work? Do police belong in schools? Learn more about what is being done to punish out of control students.
More Articles
Read more articles (16)
Education Reform (18) Teachers and Unions (10) Public School Budgets (13) Vouchers (3) School Controversies (47)